Tyre Processing Automation: From Manual Loading to Conveyor Systems

By:   author  Conor Murphy

Most tyre recycling facilities begin with a manual processing model: operators carry tyres to the baler, load the chamber by hand, and manage the full cycle without mechanical assistance. This is the lowest-capital starting point, and for facilities in their early stage of operation, it makes sense. The manual model’s limitations become apparent at scale: there is a throughput ceiling imposed by human physical capacity, a health and safety exposure from repeated heavy lifting, and a labour cost per tyre processed that does not improve with volume in the way that a mechanised system does.

The transition from manual to automated tyre processing is not a single investment decision; it is a progression through stages that each deliver measurable improvements in throughput, safety, and operational cost. This article maps that progression and identifies the decision points at which the next stage of automation becomes financially justified.

Stage One: The Manual Baseline

A manual tyre baling operation consists of a tyre baler and one to two operators managing the full cycle: receiving tyres, carrying them to the baler, loading the chamber, initiating the press cycle, tying bales, and ejecting completed bales for storage. This configuration can process 400 to 600 car tyres per day at a sustainable pace with two operators working a standard shift. The manual model is operationally straightforward, requires no conveyor infrastructure, and has minimal additional equipment cost beyond the baler.

The limitations of the manual baseline appear at volumes above 500 to 600 tyres per day. Beyond this level, maintaining processing pace through a full shift requires either additional operators (increasing labour cost per tyre) or accepting a reduction in daily throughput as operator fatigue limits pace in the latter part of the shift.

Automation StageEquipment AddedDaily Throughput (car tyres)Labour RequiredInvestment Level
Stage 1: Manual baselineTyre baler only400-600 tyres2 operatorsBaler only
Stage 2: Inclined conveyorInclined baler conveyor550-750 tyres2 operatorsLow: conveyor addition
Stage 3: Full infeed conveyorTBC8M or infeed conveyor700-1,000 tyres2 operatorsMedium: multi-conveyor
Stage 4: Sidewall cutter + conveyorSidewall cutter in lineMixed stream capability2-3 operatorsMedium-high: processing line
Stage 5: Full processing lineComplete integrated line1,000+ tyres/day2-3 operatorsHigh: full system

Stage Two: Adding the Inclined Conveyor

The first automation step that delivers the highest return relative to investment is the addition of an inclined conveyor between the tyre collection point and the baler. The conveyor takes over the lifting and elevation task that is the most physically demanding element of manual baler loading, and the one that most limits sustainable processing pace.

With the Gradeall inclined tyre baler conveyor in place, the operator’s physical load is substantially reduced, and the baler can be fed at a rate that approaches its rated throughput capacity for a full shift without the fatigue-driven pace decline that limits manual loading. This stage typically increases daily throughput by 30 to 50% over the manual baseline with the same operator headcount.

Stage Three: Extending the Conveyor Infeed

The inclined conveyor addresses the elevation bottleneck but not the horizontal transport of tyres from a storage area or vehicle unloading point to the base of the incline. In facilities where the tyre storage area is distant from the baler, operators still carry or roll tyres across the floor to the conveyor infeed, which reintroduces manual handling at an earlier point in the processing chain.

An extended horizontal infeed conveyor, carrying tyres from the intake or storage area to the base of the inclined conveyor, closes this gap. Gradeall’s TBC8M tyre baler conveyor is designed for this extended infeed configuration, moving tyres from the intake point through a horizontal run before elevation to the baler. This stage reduces the manual handling requirement to placing tyres on the conveyor at the intake point, which can be done at the same time as receiving and sorting incoming tyre deliveries.

Stage Four: Integrating a Sidewall Cutter

For operations processing commercial truck tyres alongside car tyres, the sidewall cutter is the next significant automation element. A sidewall cutter positioned in the processing line upstream of the baler removes the rigid bead and sidewall from truck tyres before they enter the baler, improving bale quality and density for commercial tyre formats. The cutter can be fed by a conveyor system and its output directed to the baler via a second conveyor, creating a continuous three-stage line: intake, cutting, baling.

The Gradeall Truck Tyre Sidewall Cutter is designed for integration in a conveyor-fed processing line. Adding this stage extends the facility’s processing capability to the full commercial tyre stream and improves the bale quality and market access for truck tyre volumes.

Frequently Asked Questions

At what daily volume should I move from manual to conveyor-fed baling?

The volume threshold at which conveyor automation becomes financially justified depends on the gate fee per tyre, the bale sale value, and the cost of additional labour. As a general indicator, facilities processing more than 400 to 500 car tyres per day and currently constrained by operator fatigue or limited to a single shift by labour capacity, should evaluate the inclined conveyor investment. At this volume, the throughput increase from a conveyor typically pays back the equipment cost within 6 to 12 months of operation.

Can automation stages be added incrementally, or must they be planned together?

Automation stages can be added incrementally. The MKII baler is designed to accept conveyor infeed as a retrofit addition, and Gradeall’s conveyor systems are dimensioned for integration with both the MKII and the wider Gradeall tyre processing range. Planning the full progression at the outset is useful for site layout purposes, even if individual stages are funded and implemented sequentially. A site layout that accommodates the eventual full conveyor run from intake to baler avoids costly repositioning of equipment between stages.

What is the typical ROI calculation for full conveyor system automation?

The ROI calculation for full conveyor automation should include: incremental bale revenue from increased throughput, labour cost saved (either reduced headcount or avoided additional headcount), reduced employers’ liability insurance cost from lower manual handling risk, and reduced sickness absence costs. The incremental revenue from throughput improvement alone is typically the largest single component and is usually sufficient to justify the investment on its own. Additional labour and safety savings make the financial case stronger. Model the specific throughput increase against your gate fee and bale sale figures for an accurate site-specific calculation.

Does automation change the skill requirements for the tyre processing workforce?

Conveyor-fed processing requires less physical capability from operators but does not reduce the skill requirements for baler operation, bale tying, and quality management. Operators managing a conveyor-fed baling line need to understand the conveyor’s operating parameters, the interlock systems between conveyor and baler, and the troubleshooting steps for common issues such as belt misalignment, tyre jams, and interlock trips. A brief additional training programme covering the conveyor system is provided by Gradeall at commissioning and should be refreshed when new operators join the processing team.

How does automation affect insurance for a tyre recycling facility?

Installing mechanical assistance for manual handling activities that have been identified in risk assessments as high-risk can positively affect employers’ liability and public liability insurance assessments. Demonstrating to your insurer that you have implemented proportionate control measures for a known high-risk activity, documented through a revised manual handling risk assessment, supports a risk management argument at insurance renewal. Some insurers actively recognise investments in manual handling risk reduction; discuss the conveyor installation with your insurance broker at the next renewal.

tyre processing automation

← Back to news