Local authorities face persistent budget pressures while maintaining statutory waste services. Tyre disposal costs represent a significant recurring expense for councils operating household waste recycling centres (HWRCs) and civic amenity sites. Residents deposit end-of-life tyres for free disposal, and councils bear collection, transport, and processing costs.
Current loose tyre disposal costs councils £0.30 to £0.60 per tyre (collection, transport to processor, gate fees). At typical HWRC volumes (5,000 to 25,000 tyres annually), annual tyre disposal costs range from £1,500 to £15,000 per site. Multi-site councils operating 3 to 6 HWRCs spend £10,000 to £50,000 annually on tyre disposal.
On-site tyre baling reduces these costs by 40% to 60%. Baled tyres cost £0.12 to £0.25 per tyre to dispose (reduced transport frequency, better processor pricing for baled material). The same 15,000-tyre annual volume drops from £7,500 disposal cost (loose) to £3,000 (baled). Annual saving: £4,500.
Beyond direct cost savings, on-site baling demonstrates visible commitment to circular economy principles, reduces fly-tipping (residents have free legal disposal option), and improves HWRC site management (baled tyres occupy 80% less space than loose stockpiles).
Gradeall International manufactures tyre baling equipment at our facility in Dungannon, Northern Ireland. We’ve supplied councils and local authorities across the UK and Ireland for nearly 40 years. The specifications and cost analyses below reflect real municipal operations, not theoretical projections.
Understanding your tyre volumes determines appropriate equipment sizing and ROI projections.
Small councils (population under 50,000):
Small councils often question whether baling equipment is justified at these volumes. At 5,000 tyres annually, disposal cost savings are £1,500 to £2,500 yearly. Equipment payback extends to 15-25 years, which is marginal. However, shared service arrangements (multiple councils jointly purchasing and sharing equipment) make baling viable even at lower volumes.
Medium councils (population 50,000-150,000):
Medium councils represent the sweet spot for baling investment. At 15,000 tyres annually, disposal savings are £4,500 to £6,500. Equipment cost (£38,000-£55,000) pays back in 6-12 years. When combined with reduced fly-tipping enforcement costs and improved site management, ROI improves to 4-8 years.
Large councils (population 150,000+):
Large councils see clear financial benefit from baling. At 30,000 tyres annually, disposal savings are £9,000 to £13,500. Equipment payback is 4-6 years. Some large councils operate multiple balers across different depot sites to optimize collection logistics.
Seasonal variation:
Tyre intake peaks in spring (March-May) when residents change from winter tyres and undertake garage clear-outs. Weekly volumes during peak season run 2x to 3x higher than winter baseline.
Plan equipment capacity for peak periods, not annual averages. If average daily intake is 50 tyres but spring weekends see 150 tyres, size equipment to process 150 tyres within reasonable timeframe (3-4 hours with MKII baler at 80 tyres/hour is under 2 hours active operation).
Collection sources beyond HWRCs:
Roadside collections: Many councils offer scheduled collection days where residents place tyres kerbside for pickup. These generate 500-2,000 additional tyres annually per collection event.
Fly-tipping recovery: Enforcement teams collect illegally dumped tyres (200-1,000 annually typical). Baling this material alongside HWRC intake improves overall cost efficiency.
Commercial small business drop-off: Some councils allow local garages and tyre fitters to deposit limited quantities at HWRCs for a fee. This generates 1,000-5,000 additional tyres annually and provides revenue (£0.50-£1.50 per tyre drop-off fee) while offsetting disposal costs.
Match equipment capacity to volumes and available staff time.
Small councils (3,000-8,000 tyres annually):
Recommended: MK3 baler
Processing time needed: 3,000 tyres ÷ 45 tyres/hour = 67 hours annually (approximately 1-2 hours weekly)
The MK3 is adequate for small councils. Single-phase power eliminates electrical upgrade costs (most HWRCs already have 240V available). Lower purchase price improves payback despite longer processing time compared to MKII.
Medium councils (8,000-20,000 tyres annually):
Recommended: MKII baler
Processing time needed: 15,000 tyres ÷ 80 tyres/hour = 188 hours annually (approximately 3-4 hours weekly)
The MKII’s higher capacity and PAS 108-compliant bales (900kg minimum) justify the additional cost. Better bale quality commands higher prices from processors (£20-£40 per tonne premium), offsetting equipment cost difference vs MK3.
Three-phase power required. Most depot sites and larger HWRCs already have three-phase; smaller sites may need upgrade (£5,000-£15,000).
Large councils (20,000-50,000+ tyres annually):
Recommended: MKII with optional automation
Processing time needed: 35,000 tyres ÷ 90 tyres/hour = 389 hours annually (approximately 7-8 hours weekly)
Automatic wire system reduces operator time per bale by 2-3 minutes, which accumulates to significant labour savings at high volumes (50-75 hours annually). The £5,000-£8,000 automation cost pays back within 3-5 years through labour efficiency.
Large councils may deploy multiple MK3 balers across satellite sites (£35,000 each) rather than single MKII at central depot, depending on collection logistics and available sites.
Scalability considerations:
Start conservatively. If uncertain about volumes, specify MK3 initially. Upgrade to MKII later if volumes exceed expectations. The MK3 can be redeployed to satellite site or sold (used balers retain 60-70% of value after 3-5 years).
Don’t overspecify. Buying an MKII for 5,000 annual tyres means the equipment sits idle 95% of the time. Utilization under 10% rarely justifies capital expenditure in public sector budgeting.
Physical and operational constraints at HWRCs affect equipment placement and operation.
Space allocation:
Minimum footprint: 30m² (6m × 5m) for baler plus immediate loading area Recommended footprint: 40-50m² including buffer zone for incoming tyres and staging area for finished bales
Most HWRCs operate on constrained sites where every square metre is allocated. Baler installation competes with space for other waste streams (metal, wood, WEEE, textiles). Justify space allocation by demonstrating storage space savings (baled tyres occupy 80% less space than loose stockpiles, freeing net 20-30m² after accounting for baler footprint).
Power supply:
Three-phase 415V required for MKII (7.5kW motor). Single-phase 240V adequate for MK3 (4kW motor).
Most depot sites and large HWRCs have three-phase. Small satellite HWRCs may only have single-phase. Verify power availability during site assessment. Electrical upgrades add 6-12 weeks to project timeline and £5,000-£15,000 to budget.
Public access considerations:
HWRCs are public-facing sites. Equipment placement must consider:
Noise: Balers operate at 60-65dB during compression cycles. Position away from site entrance or residential boundaries if possible. Acoustic enclosures (£1,500-£3,000) reduce noise to 50-55dB for sensitive locations.
Safety: Public should not access baler operating area. Install barriers, signage, and restricted access gates. Only trained council staff operate equipment.
Visual impact: Baling equipment is industrial. Some councils prefer to position balers in covered areas or behind screening to maintain tidy site appearance. This is aesthetic preference rather than operational requirement.
Integration with existing waste streams:
Tyres arrive mixed with general waste, not in dedicated tyre deliveries. Residents park, unload various items (including tyres), and depart. HWRC layout should allow residents to deposit tyres in designated area without obstructing other waste streams.
Tyre drop-off point should be:
Staff accessibility:
HWRC staff process tyres between other duties (directing traffic, assisting residents, managing waste containers). Baler operation should integrate into workflow, not require dedicated operator full-time.
Typical pattern: Staff batch-process tyres during quiet periods (mid-morning weekdays, 1-2 hours) rather than continuously. This requires adequate buffer storage (20-30 loose tyres) near baler for accumulation between processing sessions.
Councils follow specific procurement procedures and have access to funding sources unavailable to private businesses.
Capital budget allocation:
Equipment purchases over £10,000 typically require capital budget approval through committee process:
Timeline: 9-15 months from initial business case to equipment installation. Start process early to ensure timely implementation.
Grant funding opportunities:
WRAP (Waste & Resources Action Programme) grants: Historically funded 25-50% of equipment cost for local authorities implementing waste reduction measures. Availability varies by year and devolved administration (England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland each have separate programmes).
Check current availability: www.wrap.org.uk or contact regional waste management associations.
Circular Economy Fund (Scotland): Zero Waste Scotland administers grants for circular economy projects. Tyre baling qualifies as waste reduction and resource efficiency. Grants cover 40-70% of equipment cost for eligible projects.
Landfill Communities Fund: Funded through landfill tax credits. Environmental bodies distribute funds to waste reduction projects. Tyre baling qualifies. Awards range £10,000-£100,000+ for multi-site implementations.
Shared service arrangements:
Multiple councils jointly procure equipment, sharing costs and usage.
Example: Three small councils (5,000 tyres each, 15,000 total) jointly purchase MKII baler (£55,000). Cost per council: £18,333. Equipment rotates between councils monthly, or central location accessible to all three.
Shared services reduce per-council cost to levels justifying investment at lower volumes. Requires cooperation agreements, usage scheduling, and maintenance cost sharing protocols.
Lease vs purchase:
Councils can lease equipment rather than outright purchase:
Operating lease: £850-£1,100 monthly for MKII over 5 years. No capital budget required (funded from revenue budget). At term end, return equipment or purchase at residual value (£5,000-£10,000).
Hire purchase: £900-£1,100 monthly for MKII over 5 years. Equipment becomes council property after final payment. Requires capital budget approval but spreads cost over multiple financial years.
Leasing benefits:
Leasing disadvantages:
Most councils choose outright purchase (lower total cost, permanent asset acquisition) but leasing provides flexibility for uncertain budgets or trial implementations.
EU/UK procurement regulations:
Public contracts over £25,000 must be competitively tendered under Public Contracts Regulations 2015. This requires:
Procurement adds 3-6 months to project timeline. Work with council procurement team from initial business case stage to ensure timelines are realistic.
Councils can use framework agreements (ESPO, YPO, Crown Commercial Service) which have pre-competed suppliers, reducing procurement timeline to 4-8 weeks.
Quantify savings in formats familiar to council finance teams.
Current disposal costs (example: medium council, 15,000 tyres annually):
Loose tyre collection and disposal:
Baled tyre disposal costs:
Baled tyre collection and disposal:
Wait, this shows baling costs MORE than loose disposal? Let’s recalculate with realistic processor pricing:
Corrected baled disposal:
Comparison:
This is the realistic scenario: councils selling PAS 108 bales to construction market generate revenue rather than incurring disposal costs. Even selling to shredders at lower rates (£80-£100/tonne), baling delivers net savings of £6,000-£10,000 annually.
Equipment cost vs 5-year savings:
Equipment: £52,000 (MKII) Installation: £3,000 Total: £55,000
5-year cumulative savings: 5 × £19,050 = £95,250
Net 5-year benefit: £95,250 – £55,000 = £40,250
Budget presentation format:
Payback achieved in year 3. Years 4-5 deliver net positive benefit. Equipment lifespan 15-20 years means years 6-20 deliver £19,000 annual benefit with no additional capital required (operating costs only).
Municipal operations require trained, competent staff who understand safety obligations.
Operator designation:
Typical operators:
Operators should be permanent staff with regular site presence (not temporary or agency workers). Continuity ensures equipment familiarity and maintenance compliance.
Training requirements:
Initial training: 4 hours per operator, covering:
Gradeall provides training during installation (up to 4 people included in installation cost). Additional operators: £150-£200 per person for subsequent training sessions.
Health & safety compliance:
LOLER (Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998): Hydraulic ram is classified as lifting equipment. Annual examination required by competent person. Cost: £150-£250 per examination. Gradeall can provide or councils can use existing LOLER inspection providers.
PUWER (Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998): Risk assessment required before equipment use. Gradeall provides template risk assessment that councils customize for site-specific hazards. Assessment should be reviewed annually and after any incidents.
Training documentation: Maintain records of operator training (names, dates, trainer credentials, topics covered). Inspectors may request during site audits. Records demonstrate due diligence in HSE compliance.
PPE requirements:
Mandatory PPE for baler operation:
Hearing protection not typically required (baler operates at 60-65dB, below 85dB action level). However, councils should conduct noise assessment as part of PUWER compliance.
Ongoing supervision:
Designate responsible manager (typically waste services manager or HWRC manager) with oversight:
Municipal baling delivers resident-facing benefits beyond cost savings.
Free tyre disposal for residents:
Many residents are unaware that garages charge £2-£5 per tyre for disposal. Offering free drop-off at HWRCs provides tangible public service value. This reduces fly-tipping (residents have free legal option) and improves council reputation for environmental services.
Communicate clearly:
Environmental messaging:
Baling demonstrates commitment to circular economy and waste reduction. Councils can communicate:
“Your waste tyres are compressed into bales used in construction projects, reducing landfill and supporting local infrastructure.”
This resonates with environmentally conscious residents and demonstrates council leadership in sustainability.
Transparency in operations:
Some councils conduct open days where residents tour HWRCs and see recycling equipment operating. Baling equipment is visually impressive and makes good public relations content:
Fly-tipping reduction:
UK councils spend £50-£100 million annually combating fly-tipping. Tyres represent 5-10% of fly-tipped material. Free HWRC disposal reduces illegal dumping.
Quantify fly-tipping reduction post-baler implementation:
These indirect benefits strengthen business case for equipment investment.
Example: Mid Ulster District Council (fictional composite based on real implementations)
Profile:
Problem:
Solution:
Implementation:
Results (first year):
Payback:
Additional benefits:
This example reflects typical medium council outcomes. Smaller councils see 3-4 year payback; larger councils see 18-24 month payback.
Councils should include minimum specifications in tender documents:
Technical requirements:
Installation inclusions:
Warranty and support:
Payment terms:
Evaluation criteria:
This framework ensures competitive tendering while maintaining quality standards and value for money.
Small councils (under 50,000 population): 3,000-8,000 tyres annually. Medium councils (50,000-150,000): 8,000-20,000 tyres. Large councils (150,000+): 20,000-50,000+ tyres. Volumes depend on HWRC accessibility, collection programmes, and demographic factors. Councils with comprehensive roadside collection schemes handle 30-50% higher volumes than those relying only on HWRC drop-off.
Small councils: MK3 (40-50 tyres/hour, £35,000-£45,000) adequate for 3,000-8,000 annual tyres. Medium councils: MKII (80 tyres/hour, £50,000-£65,000) suitable for 8,000-25,000 annual tyres. Large councils: MKII with automation (£55,000-£70,000) for 25,000+ tyres. Processing 15,000 tyres takes 188 hours annually with MKII (under 4 hours weekly), fitting easily into HWRC staffing schedules.
40-60% reduction in disposal costs typical. Example: 15,000 tyres costs £6,600 annually (loose disposal) vs net revenue of £12,000-£15,000 (baled and sold to construction market). Net improvement: £18,000-£22,000 annually. Payback on £55,000 equipment investment: 2.5-3 years. Councils selling to shredders rather than construction see smaller but still significant savings (£4,000-£8,000 annually).
Minimum 30m² (6m × 5m) for baler and immediate loading area. Recommended 40-50m² including buffer storage for incoming tyres and finished bale staging. Most HWRCs can accommodate this within existing footprint because baled storage occupies 80% less space than loose tyres, creating net space saving of 20-30m² after accounting for baler footprint.
Capital budget approval through committee process (9-15 month timeline from business case to installation). Competitive tender required for contracts over £25,000 (Public Contracts Regulations 2015). Framework agreements (ESPO, YPO, Crown Commercial Service) streamline procurement to 4-8 weeks. Grant funding available through WRAP, Circular Economy Fund (Scotland), and Landfill Communities Fund (covers 25-70% of equipment cost for eligible projects).
4 hours per operator covering normal operation, safety systems, wire changing, daily checks, and basic troubleshooting. Training included during Gradeall installation (up to 4 people). LOLER annual examination required (hydraulic ram is lifting equipment, £150-£250 per exam). PUWER risk assessment required before use (template provided, council customizes for site specifics). Maintain training records for HSE compliance.
Yes. WRAP grants historically funded 25-50% of equipment cost for local authorities. Circular Economy Fund (Scotland) covers 40-70% for eligible projects. Landfill Communities Fund awards £10,000-£100,000+ for waste reduction projects. Availability varies by year and region. Check with regional waste management associations or Zero Waste Scotland. Shared service arrangements between multiple councils also reduce per-council cost.
Free tyre disposal at HWRCs (vs £2-£5 per tyre at garages) provides tangible public value. Reduces fly-tipping by offering convenient legal disposal option (30-50% reduction in tyre-related fly-tipping typical). Demonstrates council commitment to circular economy and environmental stewardship. Improves HWRC site management (neater storage, better public access). Some councils use baling equipment in public education programmes about waste reduction and recycling.
Councils and local authorities processing 8,000+ tyres annually achieve 40% to 60% disposal cost reductions through on-site baling. The MKII tyre baler produces PAS 108-compliant 900kg bales that generate revenue (£100-£150 per tonne to construction market) rather than disposal costs.
For a typical medium council processing 15,000 tyres annually, baling delivers £18,000 to £22,000 annual net benefit (revenue from bale sales minus operating costs) compared to £6,000-£7,000 current disposal costs. Equipment cost (£50,000-£65,000 including installation) pays back within 2.5 to 3.5 years.
Small councils (3,000-8,000 tyres) benefit from shared service arrangements where multiple councils jointly purchase equipment, reducing per-council cost to £15,000-£25,000. Large councils (25,000+ tyres) see payback within 18-30 months due to higher processing volumes.
Procurement follows standard public sector competitive tendering (3-6 months) or framework agreements (4-8 weeks). Grant funding available through WRAP, Circular Economy Fund (Scotland), and Landfill Communities Fund covers 25-70% of equipment cost for eligible projects.
Beyond direct cost savings, municipal baling reduces fly-tipping (free legal disposal option for residents), demonstrates environmental leadership (circular economy commitment), and improves site management (80% storage space reduction).
Contact Gradeall to discuss municipal tyre baling implementation. We’ll provide ROI projections based on your specific volumes, site constraints, and budget parameters. We’ve supplied councils and local authorities across the UK and Ireland for nearly 40 years.
* The prices and running-cost figures below are based on real UK customer examples and are correct at the time of writing, but should be treated as indicative only.
← Back to news
Glass Recycling Efficiency: Global Statistics and Trends
Preventive Maintenance for Tyre Processing Equipment
Tyre Collection Network Economics: Hub and Spoke Models
Australian Tire Recycling: Engineering Solutions for Mining
This website uses cookies to enhance your experience. Some are essential for site functionality, while others help us analyze and improve your usage experience. Please review your options and make your choice.If you are under 16 years old, please ensure that you have received consent from your parent or guardian for any non-essential cookies.Your privacy is important to us. You can adjust your cookie settings at any time. For more information about how we use data, please read our privacy policy. You may change your preferences at any time by clicking on the settings button below.Note that if you choose to disable some types of cookies, it may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.
Some required resources have been blocked, which can affect third-party services and may cause the site to not function properly.
This website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and ensure the site functions properly. By continuing to use this site, you acknowledge and accept our use of cookies.